Quick Check 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Do AI systems agree about your brand?

""
All providers aligned
🎯

Enter any concept to see if the machines agree

Green = consensus • Yellow = contested • Red = conflict

🔮

Checking the vibe...

Position: Brand Perception Map 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

See where AI places your brand in perception space. Choose custom axes from 25 attributes.

Axis Mapping:
Timeline:
🔍 Zoom:
📡 Signal
Signal quality from LLM consensus
🎯 Provider Legend
OpenAI
Anthropic
Google
xAI
Holographic Position

📊 Industry Benchmark:

Overall Percentile:

Compare: Side-by-Side Analysis 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Compare 2-5 brands side-by-side. See gaps, overlaps, and where providers disagree.

Analysis Lens:

DELTA
Attribute Delta
⚖️

Add 2-5 brands above and click Compare to analyze their perception differences.

📜 Recent Comparisons

No saved comparisons yet. Your comparisons will appear here.

Portfolio: All Your Brands 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Concepts
🟢 Healthy
🟡 Warning
🔴 Critical
Avg V_MAX
Avg Drift
🚨 Alerts

🏢 Your Teams

Loading...

concepts

Searching...
No results found
Loading...
No concepts yet

🗑️ Delete Team?

Are you sure you want to delete ?

⚠️ Concepts will be moved to your personal workspace.

🚨 Recent Alerts

No recent alerts. All concepts are healthy.
🔒

GDPR & Data Management

Organization-level data controls for

📦 Export Organization Data

Download all organization data including members, concepts, and analytics.

🔄 Transfer Ownership

Transfer organization ownership to another member before deleting your account.

⚠️ Delete Organization

Permanently delete this organization. All concepts will be moved to The Commons.

🇪🇺 GDPR: Organization data requests are processed within 7 days. Members cannot request personal data export/deletion - their data is managed at the organization level. Contact privacy@opengio.com for questions.

🎨 White-Label Settings

Customize OpenGIO with your organization's branding. Apply custom colors, logos, and remove OpenGIO branding.

Loading configuration...

🏷️ Branding

Logo Preview

🎨 Colors

Primary Button
Accent Text Link

⚙️ Options

⚠️ Custom CSS is injected into the page. Use with caution.

📜 Alert & Report History (Admin)

⏳ Loading alert history...
📭

No alerts found matching your filters

Date Severity Type Brand Message Status
🎨

White-Label Branding

Remove OpenGIO branding and customize colors, logos, and styling for your organization.

Requires Enterprise
Upgrade to Enterprise

⚠️ Delete Organization?

You are about to delete .

This action will:

  • Delete all organization members' access
  • Move all concepts to The Commons (public)
  • Cancel any active subscriptions
  • This cannot be undone after 7-day grace period

Type DELETE to confirm:

🔄 Transfer Organization Ownership

Select a member to transfer ownership of .

⚠️ After transfer, you will become a regular member and the new owner will have full control.

AI Briefs: Executive Summaries 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Auto-generated reports for leadership. Share perception insights without logging in.

📝
AI Briefs

Auto-generate executive summaries of brand perception. Share clear reports on position, trends, risks, and opportunities.

Requires Pro

Enable AI Briefs
📝
Select a concept to generate or view briefs
AI Briefs provide executive-ready summaries of brand perception

Briefs for

Loading briefs...
📭
No briefs generated yet
Click "Generate Brief" to create an executive summary

📝 Executive Brief

Brand Position
Where AI models place your brand on key dimensions
Innovation
Sentiment
Accessibility
Scale: -1.0 (low) to +1.0 (high)
30-Day Movement
How brand perception has shifted recently
Innovation
Sentiment
Accessibility
Center = no change • Left = declining • Right = improving
AI Model Agreement
How much AI providers agree on brand perception
AI providers analyzed.
90-Day Outlook
Projected brand trajectory based on current trends
At Risk Needs Attention Stable Opportunity
actions • voids
⚠️ AI-Generated Content: This executive brief was synthesized by AI from multi-provider perception analysis. It reflects LLM-derived interpretations and should be validated against primary sources before use in decision-making. View full methodology

🔗 Share

Share
⚠️ Please log in to create shareable links
Creating share...
Share Created!
Expires in 90 days

Shares are public and expire after 90 days. Max file size: 10MB.

🔗 Legacy Embed

Embed on your website

Provider Map 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

View configured LLM providers and their status. Calibration metrics from today's diagnostic.

Loading Providers...

Checking AI provider connectivity.

Agreement: Provider Consensus 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

How much do AI providers agree about your brand? Smaller sphere means higher agreement.

Provider Legend
OpenAI
Anthropic
Google
xAI
Consensus Analysis
Consensus Score
Radius:

Interpretation Guide

Small/Dense Sphere (Cyan): High Consensus (>70%) — Providers agree on concept identity
Medium Sphere (Gold): Moderate Consensus (40-70%) — Some variance between providers
Large/Ghostly Sphere (Magenta): Low Consensus (<40%) — Concept identity is fragmented across models

Trends: Perception Movement 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Track how AI perception is shifting. Deterministic sampling + EMA smoothing — movement that persists is real signal.

Provider Legend
OpenAI
Anthropic
Google
xAI
Current Position
Prediction Path
Trends Analysis
Momentum Score
Velocity: (, , )

Vector Guide

Arrow Direction: Where the concept is moving in perception space
Arrow Length: Magnitude of change (velocity)
Streamlines: Predicted trajectory based on current momentum

Signal History: Agreement Over Time 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Track how stable AI agreement has been over time.

📊 Portfolio Calibration

V_MAX (Noise Floor)
Mean Variance
Concepts Analyzed
Snapshots Scanned
⚠️ Jammed Signals (High Variance)
✅ Crystal Clear (Low Variance)
Provider Jitter
OpenAI
Anthropic
Gemini
Grok
V_MAX Threshold
Signal History Analysis
→→→ PRESENT ( snapshots)
Confidence Score
Variance:

Signal History Guide

Low Variance: High agreement — providers agree on concept identity
High Variance: Low agreement — providers interpret differently
V_MAX: Noise floor threshold — variance above this indicates fragmented narrative

Opportunities: Find White Space 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Discover unoccupied positioning opportunities. Glowing areas show where no competitors exist.

Industry:
Loading...
+ more
📐 Perception Space
Shapes by Consensus Level
▲ Void Opportunity
◇ Low Consensus (<40%)
◇ Moderate (40-70%)
✦ High Consensus (≥70%)
Consensus Coloring
Low → Moderate → High
X: Functional ↔ Conceptual
Y: Mass ↔ Elite
Z: Negative ↔ Positive
Position: (, , )
📡 Adjacent Intelligence
Nearest concepts in perception space
+ more nearby
Blue Ocean Opportunities
Click glowing voxels to explore

Void Map Guide

Glowing Voxels: Unoccupied space — potential opportunity zones
Dark Voxels: Crowded space — many concepts compete here
Click to Explore: Get perception coordinates for targeting

Surface Detail: Deep Perception Scan 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

High-resolution perception mapping. Run calibration first to enable detailed scanning.

Sensors Offline
Perception Axes
X → Innovativeness
Z → Accessibility
Y ↑ Confidence
Providers
OpenAI
Gemini
Anthropic
Grok
Large spheres = exact provider positions
Surface color = IDW interpolation
Surface Points
Coherence:

Surface Detail - View Modes

🏔️ Terrain: 3D surface with height = confidence. Classic topographical view.
🌌 Point Cloud: True LiDAR style scatter with intensity-based coloring.
🗺️ Contour: 2D topographical map with iso-lines at confidence levels.
☁️ Gaussian: Soft glowing clouds showing provider influence regions.
🔷 Voronoi: Territory zones showing which provider dominates each area.
🔥 Heat Dome: Pressure dome visualization with heat gradient coloring.

Multi-Concept: Compare Brands in Space 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Map 1-5 brands together. See which ones cluster and which stand apart.

Multi-Gravity Analysis
🎯 Concept Centers
Drag centers to rearrange
📖 Visual Legend
Sphere Color — Good Will
Glow — Generative (>50)
Red Halo — Extractive
Size — Social Density
💓 Pulse — Agency
Orbits — Concept paths
📊 Perception Distances
Lower distance = more semantic overlap in LLM data.
Close concepts share industry, supply chain, positioning.
● <0.1 = Near-identical positioning
● 0.1-0.3 = Same industry/category
● 0.3-0.5 = Related but differentiated
● >0.5 = Distinct concept identities
🌌 Concepts in Orbit
Orbit distance = 1 − semantic similarity. Click to highlight.
● <0.1 Close ● <0.3 Loose ● >0.5 Distant

Multi-Concept Guide

Colored Suns: Each concept creates its own gravity center
Connection Lines: Distance between centers = semantic similarity
Shared Orbiters: Concepts that orbit ALL centers simultaneously
Drag to Rearrange: Custom positions are saved to your session

Word Cloud: Brand Associations 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

See what words AI associates with your brand. Closer words mean stronger associations.

Word Cloud
🔍 Concept Details
Distance:
Strength:

Word Cloud Guide

Central Word: Your brand at the center of the cloud
Word Size: Larger text = closer semantic association
Word Brightness: Brighter = stronger connection
Navigation: Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom, fly through the cloud

Recommendations: Counter-Drift Guidance 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Get suggestions when perception shifts. AI analyzes 45 attributes to recommend corrective messaging.

🎯
Recommendations

Get AI-powered suggestions when perception shifts away from your target position. Upgrade to Pro for corrective messaging guidance.

Requires Pro

Enable Recommendations
Drift Magnitude
Primary Concern
Confidence
Est. Correction

Steering Recommendations

⚠️ AI-Generated Recommendations: Steering recommendations are algorithmically derived based on semantic drift patterns. These are suggestions, not guarantees of outcomes. Actual repositioning requires human judgment and market validation. View methodology

Enter a brand/concept name and click "Calculate Steering" to analyze drift and generate recommendations.

Stress Test: Perception Stability 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Test how stable your brand perception is under challenging prompts.

🎭
Stress Test

Test how stable your brand perception is under challenging conditions. Find vulnerabilities before they become problems.

Requires Pro

Enable Stress Testing
Overall Fragility
Most Fragile
Most Stable
Tests Run

Provider Fragility Index

⚠️ Adversarial Testing Disclosure: Fragility indices measure response variance across edge-case prompts. High fragility indicates inconsistent LLM behavior, not factual errors. Results should inform strategy, not replace human analysis. View methodology

Provider × Category Fragility Heatmap

Click any cell for detailed breakdown. Colors: 🟢 <25% | 🟡 25-40% | 🔴 >40%

PROVIDER

No category data available yet.

Run a new stress test to populate the heatmap with per-category fragility data.

Breaking Points Log

Prompts that caused refusals, confusion, or errors across providers.

No breaking points recorded yet. Run some stress tests to identify provider weaknesses.

Test History

No test history yet. Run your first stress test to begin tracking.

📈 Fragility Trend Over Time

Data Points
Avg Fragility
Trend
Brands Tested
100% 50% 0%
Fragility
Most Fragile
Most Stable

Not enough data points for trend analysis.

Run at least 2 stress tests to see fragility trends over time.

Enter a brand/concept, select a test suite and click "Run Stress Test" to begin adversarial testing.

×

Fragility
Avg Score
Variance
Confusion Rate
Refusal Rate
Prompts Tested
💡 Insight

What-If: Repositioning Simulator 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Simulate a repositioning move. See difficulty, competitors in target zone, and what needs to change.

🎯
What-If Simulator

Model repositioning scenarios before committing. See difficulty scores and what needs to change to reach your target position.

Requires Pro

Enable What-If
Axis Mapping:
🎯
Select a concept to model repositioning scenarios
Enter a concept name and click "Load Brand" to begin

Target Position

Current Position:
X: Y: Z:
-1.0 +1.0
-1.0 +1.0
-1.0 +1.0

🎯 Repositioning Vector (3D Space)

🖱️ Drag to rotate • Scroll to zoom • Right-click to pan • ↕ Drag bottom edge to resize
ΔX (Ethical)
ΔY (Innovation)
ΔZ (Trust)

Difficulty Analysis

Difficulty Score
Distance to Target
Estimated Time

⚠️ Competitors in Target Zone

📈 Repositioning Plan

💡 AI Recommendations

📁 Saved Scenarios

⚠️ Predictive Modeling Disclosure: Difficulty scores and time estimates are AI-derived projections based on perception distances and historical patterns. Actual repositioning outcomes depend on market conditions, execution quality, and factors beyond LLM analysis. View methodology

Market Signals: External Correlations 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Connect perception changes to news, social media, and market movements.

📈
Market Signals

Connect perception changes to news coverage, social volume, and market movements. Find leading indicators.

Requires Enterprise

Upgrade to Enterprise
📈
Select a concept to analyze correlations
Requires brands with external signal data (stock ticker, social handles)
⚠️
Signals: No external signals available

Statistically Significant Correlations

p < 0.05
📊
No statistically significant correlations found
in this time period. Try a longer window or check if external signals are available.

📈 Correlation Flow

vs
Perception Metric
External Signal
Drag to rotate • Scroll to zoom • Lines that move together = positive correlation
These correlations may be due to random chance (p ≥ 0.05). Interpret with caution.

Correlation Matrix

Metric Stock Price Social Volume News Volume
Strong Positive
Moderate Positive
Weak/None
Moderate Negative
Strong Negative
* p < 0.05

Audit Trail: Tamper-Proof Records 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Seal perception snapshots with cryptographic proof. Create verifiable records for compliance and disputes.

🏛️
Audit Trail

Create tamper-proof records of brand perception at specific points in time. Useful for compliance, disputes, and historical analysis.

Requires Pro

Enable Audit Trail
Total Records
Unique Brands
Tree Depth
Merkle Root

Sealed Records

⚠️

Delete Golden Record?

You are about to permanently delete:

This action cannot be undone and will break Merkle tree integrity.

📊 Golden Record Explorer

No sealed records found for this brand.

▶️ Replay: @

Open in:
🎯 Centroid Position
X (Trust)
Y (Innovation)
Z (Authority)
Consensus Score
Provider Positions
🌀 Attribute Snapshot
🎭 Brand Personality
📜 Rhetoric
🌍 Cultural-Economic
⏰ Temporal
🧠 OCEAN Personality
🧬 Social Fabric
📊 Narrative Gini

📈 Drift Analysis:

Record A
Record B
🎯 Centroid Drift
📊 Consensus Drift
Record A
Record B
Δ Change
🧭 Overall Semantic Drift
Euclidean Distance

Select a brand to view or compare its Golden Records.

▶️ Replay:

Open in:
🎯 Centroid Position
X (Trust)
Y (Innovation)
Z (Authority)
Consensus Score
Provider Positions
🌀 Attribute Snapshot
Captured: | Leaf Hash:

Enter a brand name and click "Seal Record" to create a cryptographically-signed Golden Record.

Golden Record Detail

⚠️ Confirm Delete

This will permanently delete this Golden Record. This action cannot be undone and will break Merkle tree integrity.

Brand Name
Captured At
Consensus Score
📋 Brand Metadata Snapshot
Description
Industry
Target Audience
Keywords
Competitors
🌐 Global
Centroid Position (Semantic Coordinates)
X (Trust)
Y (Innovation)
Z (Authority)
Provider Positions
Cryptographic Verification
Leaf Hash:
Merkle Root:
Attestation
⚖️ EUAI Act Relevant

Provider Profiles

🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology ⏰ Daily 3 AM UTC
Provider Alerts:
Fleet Avg: A: B: C: Bias: Crea: Eth: Int:

Provider Personality Fingerprint

7-Axis Provider Fingerprint • Higher = Stronger Expression

🔍 Click chart to expand individual provider views 📉 Click to collapse

Cluster A Odd/Eccentric Cluster B Dramatic Cluster C Anxious Bias Cognitive Creativity Semantic Ethics Principlism Interaction Dynamics
OpenAI Anthropic Google xAI

Extended Psychometric Graphs

28 dimensions across 4 specialized graphs

Click any graph to expand individual provider views

Cognitive Style

Cert Abst Temp Caus Anal Scop Flex

Social/Relational

Syco Auth Ingr ToM Emot Powr Conf

Epistemic

Unce Sorc Para Conf Evid Revi Meta

Behavioral/AI

Fide Refu Safe Self Cntx Tool Guar

Derived from daily calibration diagnostics • Axes at 0.50 await future scenarios

📈 DSM-5 Cluster Timeline (30 Days)

Click provider to isolate • Click again to show all
1.0
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.0
A (Odd)
B (Dramatic)
C (Anxious)
📊 Timeline graph will appear after multiple days of calibration data.

📊 Diagnostic Matrix — Raw Scenario Scores

Provider Gran Vol Frag Narr Mimi Ctrl Bnd Sinc Open Anch Fram Sunk Orig Flue Flex U/D Virt Care Fawn Drft Soc A B C Bias

Scores normalized 0.0-1.0 • Higher = stronger expression • Hover column headers for full scenario names

🧪 Diagnostic Scenarios Reference

Performance: Provider Speed & Reliability 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Monitor response times, throughput, and reliability across AI providers.

Loading benchmark data...
Time to First Token
Fleet Average
Tokens Per Second
Fleet Average
Total Latency
Fleet Median
Variability (CV)
Fleet Consistency
Preamble Rate
Filler Phrases

⚡ Provider Performance Leaderboard

Rank Provider Model TTFT (ms) TPS Latency (ms) CV % Preamble % Trend

📈 Performance History (7 Days)

🔴 Live Provider Status

Monitor: LLM Quality & Intelligence 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Quality benchmarks measuring reasoning, accuracy, safety, and instruction following across LLM providers.

Loading quality data...
TruthfulQA
Factual Accuracy
SIQA
Social Intelligence
IFEval
Instruction Following
SimpleQA
Knowledge Recall
BBQ
Bias Mitigation

🎯 Quality Benchmark Results

Provider Model TruthfulQA SIQA IFEval SimpleQA BBQ Quality Index

🕸️ Quality Radar

🪡 Needle in Haystack (Context Retrieval)

Loading NIAH data...
👆
Select a model above to view context retrieval performance
📊
NIAH benchmarks run weekly on Sunday at 8 AM UTC
Context
0.0
0.5
1.0
← Shallow Needle Depth Deep →

Cost: LLM Economics & Efficiency 🤖 AI-Generated | 4 Providers | ℹ️ Methodology

Cost analysis and efficiency metrics for LLM providers: price per token, quality-adjusted costs, and value rankings.

Loading pricing data...
Avg Input Price
per 1K tokens
Avg Output Price
per 1K tokens
Best Value
Quality/Price Ratio
Most Economical
Lowest Cost

💰 Pricing Comparison

Provider Model Input $/1K Output $/1K Blended $/1K Quality Index Value Score

📊 Quality vs Price

🏆 Efficiency Ranking